Leadership is a funny thing. There are tons of books written on the topic and still it remains an enigma. I'm trying my hand at making sense of the beast.
In very simple terms, a Leader is responsible for developing a vision of what's possible, gathering a bunch of people towards realising that vision, keeping them motivated through the journey, making course corrections wherever necessary and watching the progress till the vision is achieved. In fact, the vision is rarely achieved because it is a moving target, but more on that later!
In theory this sounds simple. However, there are differences in how people do each of the above, thereby creating different Leadership styles. I feel it is as important to understand why these differences arise as it is to categorize the differences themselves.
In my pov, there are three main factors that determine a person's Leadership style - Character, Situation, People.
Character is the intrinsic core of a person. It is an amalgamation of a person's ego, his self-perception, his degree of security, esteem and assurance. It directly manifests in a person's behavior. Some Leaders are therefore very authoritarian, others are more receptive. Some think position grants them the right to violate others' dignity, others steer from making this assumption. Some like a following, others a healthy debate. Some like to talk, others like to listen. But character only dictates the starting point. And often Leaders veer far away from the starting point depending on the situation and people involved.
Some situations lend themselves to more Transformative behaviors. Others need more transactional stuff. A crisis, for example, would need all hands on the deck. A steady state business on the other hand, would mean the Leader can 'let go' and focus elsewhere.
Ditto for people. Some people inspire confidence in a Leader to 'let go'. Others send signals that spark panic. Leaders respond differently to different people. If they know what to expect, they don't typically ask. If they know that promises made are usually kept, they won't peer over your shoulder. If they know that they'll get the bad news as fast as the good news, they won't second guess. In that sense, a Leader is as good as the person or team he is leading.
All being said, Leadership is a contract between the Leader and the Led. This contract depends to a larget extent on the kind of person that the Leader is (therefore pray that you are not stuck with an insecure person who derives his self-worth through others' affirmation). However, it also varies with the situation and can be influenced by the person who is being led.
This thought is very empowering. It transfers the Locus of Control to the 'Led'. It says that while you can't choose your Leader, you can choose his Leadership style for him!
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
My perspective was largely shaped by ideas I picked up through some formal training: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/degrees/teaching-courses/course-listing/mld-202
This guy's book on real leadership is pretty good too.
i like the way you have put it " it's a contract". resonated with my thinking... it depends on who is being led and who is leading it.. hence various definitions, dpending uposn situations,circumstances...
Nice read...
Actually it is a complex equation with many variables...But I believe the leadership style is largely dependent the intrinsic nature of the leader and less on wht kind of team you have.. The vision/goal, how close is the vision to the leaders heart? and the security level of the leader are prime factors.
“A leader leads by example, whether he intends to or not.” :)
Post a Comment